Difference between absolute liability and strict liability
Answers
Answered by
1
Answer:
In a crime of strict or absolute liability, a person could be guilty even if there was no intention to commit a crime. The difference between strict and absolute liability is whether the defence of a “mistake of fact” is available: in a crime of absolute liability, a mistake of fact is not a defence.
Answered by
0
Answer:
In a crime of strict or absolute liability, a person could be guilty even if there was no intention to commit a crime.
The difference between strict and absolute liability is whether the defence of a
“mistake of fact”
is available: in a crime of absolute liability, a mistake of fact is not a defence.
I hope help ✌️❤️
Similar questions