Difference between non-coperation and civil disobedient movement?
Answers
Answered by
6
The Non-Cooperation movement was launched by Gandhi on 1st August 1920 while the Civil Disobedience movement was launched by Gandhi on 6th April 1930 at Dandi in Gujarat. Thus there was a gap of 10 years between the two movements.
The Civil Disobedience movement was centred around the defiance of salt laws throughout the country which became the symbol of the movement. The Non-Cooperation movement did not have any such single defining symbol around which the entire movement was centred.
The goal of the Non-Cooperation movement was Swaraj or self-rule by demanding the status of dominion status from the British government. While the goal of the Civil Disobedience movement had moved further; from Swaraj to complete independence from foreign rule.
There was large scale participation of Muslim working class in the Non-Cooperation movement which was not witnessed in the Civil Disobedience movement later on due to the Divide and Rule policy of the British and communal propaganda of Muslim League and Hindu Mahasabha.
Over 90,000 people went to jail during the course of the Civil Disobedience movement — more than three times the figure for the Non-Cooperation movement.
The Civil Disobedience movement was much more widespread in its geographical extent and mass participation as compared to the Non-Cooperation movement.
For Indian women, the Civil Disobedience movement was the most liberating experience to date and can truly be said to have marked their entry into the public space.
The Civil Disobedience movement was of much longer duration. It ended in two phases. The second phase ended in April 1934, four years after its launch. The Non-Cooperation movement was of shorter duration and was withdrawn on 12th February 1922 after the Chauri Chaura incident on 5th February 1922. It thus lasted for one and a half years only
HOPE U GET IT....
Answered by
8
Here is your answer mate
The congress decided to start a Non-cooperation movement under the leadership of Ganjhiji . The movement aimed at protesting against British repression in Punjab and their policy towards Turkey . It was also for the attainment of self-governance. Non-cooperation means to boycott Britain made goods . Along with boycott and Non-cooperation, a constructive programmme was also launched. It included the..
•Popularization of hindu-muslim unity ,
•abolition of untouchability and
•spread of education
The movement was success. while After the withdrawal of Non-cooperation movement, the congress was divided into 2 groups. One group led by C.R Das , Motilal nehru and Vithalbhai patel wanted to end boycott of the legislative councils. They wanted the congress to take part in the elections, join the government and then work to destroy the working of the legislatures from inside. So, these PRO-CHANGERS wanted to enter the legislature and then make it impossible for the government to function by opposing all its policies.
The second group, called NO-CHANGERS opposed joining the council . This group wanted to undertake a constructive programme . This group was led by Vallabhbhai patel , C. Rajagopalchari and Rajendra prasad. In 1923 , the PRO- CHANGERS formed " Congress khilafat swarajya party", popularly known as "SWARAJ PARTY".
Hope it will help you.
If you find it appropriate then mark it as branliest.....☆
The congress decided to start a Non-cooperation movement under the leadership of Ganjhiji . The movement aimed at protesting against British repression in Punjab and their policy towards Turkey . It was also for the attainment of self-governance. Non-cooperation means to boycott Britain made goods . Along with boycott and Non-cooperation, a constructive programmme was also launched. It included the..
•Popularization of hindu-muslim unity ,
•abolition of untouchability and
•spread of education
The movement was success. while After the withdrawal of Non-cooperation movement, the congress was divided into 2 groups. One group led by C.R Das , Motilal nehru and Vithalbhai patel wanted to end boycott of the legislative councils. They wanted the congress to take part in the elections, join the government and then work to destroy the working of the legislatures from inside. So, these PRO-CHANGERS wanted to enter the legislature and then make it impossible for the government to function by opposing all its policies.
The second group, called NO-CHANGERS opposed joining the council . This group wanted to undertake a constructive programme . This group was led by Vallabhbhai patel , C. Rajagopalchari and Rajendra prasad. In 1923 , the PRO- CHANGERS formed " Congress khilafat swarajya party", popularly known as "SWARAJ PARTY".
Hope it will help you.
If you find it appropriate then mark it as branliest.....☆
Anonymous:
hi aania
Similar questions