Social Sciences, asked by johnsongiri775, 6 months ago

difference between primary source and secondary sources of history.in point

Answers

Answered by banthiaswastik
30

Answer:

Primary sources are the historical documents used by historians as evidence. ... In contrast, a secondary source is the typical history book which may discuss a person, event or other historical topic. A good secondary source uses primary sources as evidence.

Explanation:

Answered by gauri1sainisl
8

Answer:

The primary source of history contributes the first-hand data or accounts or testimony from a particular era or period.

The secondary sources of history analyze the primary sources.

Explanation:

  1. The primary source consists of historical documents which are utilized by historians as evidence.
  • They are the authentic or original documents written or recorded by the people who witnessed the event in the first place or experienced it.
  • For Example- Diaries, Interviews, letters, photographs, court records, etc.

    2. The Secondary sources also utilized the primary sources to prove a  point or to direct the reader to create a certain point of view or opinion.

  • They are built on a foundation of historical evidence or primary sources as they consist of interpretation or arguments regarding the past.
  • For Example- Journals, articles, books, encyclopedias, bibliographies, etc.

Similar questions