History, asked by jjchaddarwala1024, 9 months ago

Difference between replacement and regional continuity models

Answers

Answered by namantanwar29
21
There have been two prevalent, contrasting theories as to how humans came up in various regions on Earth.

One of them is the Regional Continuity Model, which emphasizes that the archaic Homo sapiens in different regions gradually evolved at different rates into modern human beings, and hence there were variations in the appearance of the first human beings on different parts of the world.
This argument is based on the regional differences in the features of present-day humans.

The other is the Replacement Model, which visualizes the complete replacement of all older forms of humans with modern humans.
This view is supported by the evidence of the genetic and anatomic homogeniety amongst all modern humans. Historians who support this view argue that the enormous similarity is due to the common descent from a population that originated in a single region, which is Africa
Answered by DivyaGolakiya
17
Regional continuity model belongs to human origin assets that is consider by modern Homo sapiens and developed from different regional populations.
This includes archaic homo sapiens that includes previously evolved from regional populations of erectus.
The replacement continuity delivers partial theory and includes fact that these homo sapiens are migrated out Africa and into Europe and Asia.

Read more on Brainly.in - https://brainly.in/question/1354333#readmore
Similar questions