Social Sciences, asked by govind2909, 1 year ago

difference between subsidiary alliances and doctrine of lapse​

Answers

Answered by Anonymous
3

Answer:

The policy of subsidiary alliance was started by then Governor-general Lord Wellesley. Under this policy a ruler could not maintain an independent army, he and his empire would be under the protection of the East India Company.

Answered by anisha6231
8

here is your answer .

hope it helps you follow me.

subsidiary Alliance ;-

  • the doctrine of subsidiary Alliance was introduced by marquees Wellesley. the governor general of India from 1798 to 1805.
  • the purpose was to gain control over last tracts of India without carrying out direct words or spending any money on maintaining troof .

doctrine of lapse

  • the doctrine of lapse was an annexation policy devised by Lord Dalhousie the government General of India between 1848 and 1856.
  • according to the doctor in the rulers of Indian princely states or territory under subsidiary Alliance with the British and without a natural heir To The Throne had to take permission from the British to adapt and heir.

Similar questions