Differences between social stratification , hierarchy and inequality
Answers
Difference between Social Stratification and Social Inequality!
There are writers like Tumin (1969) who think that there is no difference between stratification and social inequality. For them, these two terms are synonymous. But, there is a band of other scholars, like Haralambos and Holborn (2000) who have made distinction between these two phenomena.
For such scholars, a society can exhibit inequality without being stratified—for example, by affording truly equal opportunity to all but distributing rewards based upon performance. Thus, it is possible for social inequality to exist without social strata. Stratification is systematic and is based on identifiable social processes through which people are sorted into categories such as caste, class, race and gender.
ADVERTISEMENTS:
For Haralambos, social stratification is a particular form of social inequality and it refers to the presence of social groups which are ranked one above the other, usually in terms of the amount of power, prestige and wealth their members possess. Those who belong to a particular group or stratum will have ‘consciousness of kind’—a common identity, like interests and a similar lifestyle. The-Indian caste system provides the best example of social stratification system.
On the other hand, the term ‘social inequality’ simple refers to the existence of socially created inequalities. It is not biologically based, for example, whites might claim superiority over blacks. There is probably no relationship between genetically based and socially created inequality in traditional Hindu society.
Social inequality is a condition in which members of a society have different amount of wealth, prestige and power. It entails unequal rewards or opportunities for different individuals within a group or groups within a society. If equality is judged in terms of equality of opportunity, or equality of outcome, then inequality is a constant feature of the human condition.
In a nutshell, the difference between social stratification and social inequality can be exhibited as under:
the difference between social stratification and social inequality
Many scholars of different political persuasions regard equality of opportunity as a pre-condition for a fair society. Of course, equality of opportunity does not guarantee equality of outcome. It simply means that people will achieve jobs suitable to their intelligence and talents, regardless of social background. Marxists want a different kind of equality from this. They want resources to be distributed in terms to need rather than competition.
There are people who are influenced by both views. Perhaps, there is no issue other than inequality, its causes and consequences particularly as they relate to social class, gender, ethnicity and locality, which has been debated hotly by social scientists in the 20th century and this debate still continues. It has become more important in the wake of liberalisation and globalisation.
Social stratification, hierarchy and inequality.
Explanation:
- Social stratification refers to the category of the people into groups on the basis of socio-economic factors like the income and wealth, race and education, social status, and power.
- Thus are positioned in a separate social unit like a geographic area. This occurs mostly in a state-based, polycentric, and feudal society. According to Marx weber divided social stratification as class, power and status.
- While a hierarchy is an arrangement of objects and categories one after another in terms of the vertically or horizontally depending on the power and superiority of ranks or orders.
- The stratification may lead to social inequality in terms of income, social status, gender biases, race and ethnicity, and may lead to racism. Also related to property as there is a large gap between the country's levels of development.
Learn more about the social stratification, hierarchy and inequality.
- brainly.in/question/5322195 answered by Anshul2005b.