different between rajatrangi and tahair i hind
Answers
Answer:
raja trangi is a king tahair is a person
Answer:
Rajatarangini, (Sanskrit: “River of Kings”) historical chronicle of early India, written in Sanskrit verse by the Kashmiri Brahman Kalhana in 1148, that is justifiably considered to be the best and most authentic work of its kind. It covers the entire span of history in the Kashmir region from the earliest times to the date of its composition.
That noble-minded poet alone merits praise whose word, like the sentence of a judge, keeps free from love or hatred in recording the past
Rajatarangini, which consists of 7,826 verses, is divided into eight books. Book I attempts to weave imaginary tales of Kashmir kings into epic legends. Gonanda was the first king and a contemporary and enemy of the Hindu deity Krishna. Traces of genuine history are also found, however, in references to the Mauryan emperors Ashoka and Jalauka; the Buddhist Kushan kings Hushka (Huviska), Jushka (Vajheska), and Kanishka (Kaniska); and Mihirakula, a Huna king.
In style the Rajatarangini narrative is sometimes considered as versified prose on a massive scale, yet its strong structural appeal made it a model for later historians. In fact, the history of Kashmir was continued, along Kalhana’s line, down to some years after the annexation of Kashmir by the Mughal emperor Akbar (1586) in the following works: Rajatarangini (by Jonaraja), Jainatarangini (by Shrivara), and Rajavalipataka (by Prajyabhatta and Shuka). Neither in style nor in authenticity do these works approximate the quality of Kalhana’s
His access to minute details of contemporary court intrigues was almost direct: his father and uncle were both in the Kashmir court. Regarding the events of the past, Kalhana’s search for material was truly fastidious. He delved deep into such model works as the Harsacarita and the Brihat-samhita epics and used with commendable familiarity the local rajakathas (royal chronicles) and such previous works on Kashmir as Nripavali by Kshemendra, Parthivavali by Helaraja, and Nilamatapurana. He displayed surprisingly advanced technical expertise for the time in his concern for unconventional sources. He looked up a variety of epigraphic sources relating to royal eulogies, construction of temples, and land grants; he studied coins, monumental remains, family records, and local traditions. But his traditional conceptual framework, using uncritical assumptions and a belief in the role of the poet as an exponent of moral maxims, makes the idealizing content in his narrative, particularly for the early period, rather dominant.
In style the Rajatarangini narrative is sometimes considered as versified prose on a massive scale, yet its strong structural appeal made it a model for later historians. In fact, the history of Kashmir was continued, along Kalhana’s line, down to some years after the annexation of Kashmir by the Mughal emperor Akbar (1586) in the following works: Rajatarangini (by Jonaraja), Jainatarangini (by Shrivara), and Rajavalipataka (by Prajyabhatta and Shuka). Neither in style nor in authenticity do these works approximate the quality of Kalhana’s Rajatarangini.
Alberuni, the famous historian of medieval period, wrote this book in Arabic. Its English translation was done by C. Saachau. Later on, Rajini Kant Sharma translated it into Hindi. Alberuni was born in the territory of Khiva. When Mahmood Ghaznavi conquered his native land Khiva in A.D. 1017 he was one of the war prisoners but soon he was released and permitted to lead a free life. Mahmood’s invasions pertured is mind so much that he refused to live in Ghazni, nor did he accept my job in th Sultanate. Soon he left Ghazni and travelled along with invading armies of Mahmood as a freelance observer. During Mahamood’s Indian invasions Alberuni was with him. He studied Sanskrit and wrote the accounts of the country, entitled Tahqiq-i-Hind, one of his most significant works.
This book is an authentic primary source of information about the socio-religious condition of India and her cultural heritage. He also analyzed in a proper way the reasons of defeat of the Hindus. He best utilized the Sanskrit sources to prove his viewpoint. He has painted an impartial picture of the contemporary political, social, economic and religious conditions of India.