different between renewable and non renewable resources any 5 points ( pls answer faster )
Answers
Answered by
2
Hey here's your answer
Renewable resources are which can be renewed within a short period of time and Examples include oxygen, fresh water, solar energy and biomass.
Non renewable resources are those resources which cannot be renewed within a short period of time it take millions of to reform such as Fossil fuels
I HOPE IT IS HELPFUL FOR you
Please mark me as brainliest
Renewable resources are which can be renewed within a short period of time and Examples include oxygen, fresh water, solar energy and biomass.
Non renewable resources are those resources which cannot be renewed within a short period of time it take millions of to reform such as Fossil fuels
I HOPE IT IS HELPFUL FOR you
Please mark me as brainliest
khushi1513:
i can't i'm sorry I can't give 5 points but what I know I had
texted that answer
tq
fine
wc
Answered by
1
Hey
Here is your answer,
✔Renewable resources are the resources which can be revived, through the natural process, over time. On the other hand, non-renewable resources are the natural resources which are not going to be replenished, shortly.
✔Renewable resources do not become extinct easily, and so they are sustainable in nature. Conversely, non-renewable resources deplete over time, i.e. they are exhaustible in nature, which can be ended when they are prone to large scale consumption.
✔Renewable resources exist in nature in infinite quantity, but non-renewable resources are present in limited quantity.
✔Renewable resources emit less carbon as compared to non-renewable resources. Hence, they are pollution free and environment-friendly.
✔As renewable resources are available to us in abundance, they are relatively cheaper than non-renewable resources, which are costlier. However, the maintenance cost of renewable resources is higher than that of non-renewable resources.
✔The renewable resources regenerate/reproduce itself, faster than it is used up by the living organisms. In contrast, the non-renewable resources either take centuries to regenerate itself, or they get extinct, so the scale at which it is regenerated is lower than that of its consumption.
Hope it helps you!
Here is your answer,
✔Renewable resources are the resources which can be revived, through the natural process, over time. On the other hand, non-renewable resources are the natural resources which are not going to be replenished, shortly.
✔Renewable resources do not become extinct easily, and so they are sustainable in nature. Conversely, non-renewable resources deplete over time, i.e. they are exhaustible in nature, which can be ended when they are prone to large scale consumption.
✔Renewable resources exist in nature in infinite quantity, but non-renewable resources are present in limited quantity.
✔Renewable resources emit less carbon as compared to non-renewable resources. Hence, they are pollution free and environment-friendly.
✔As renewable resources are available to us in abundance, they are relatively cheaper than non-renewable resources, which are costlier. However, the maintenance cost of renewable resources is higher than that of non-renewable resources.
✔The renewable resources regenerate/reproduce itself, faster than it is used up by the living organisms. In contrast, the non-renewable resources either take centuries to regenerate itself, or they get extinct, so the scale at which it is regenerated is lower than that of its consumption.
Hope it helps you!
Similar questions