Directions: Each of these questions consists of two statements followed by two conclusions I and II. Find which of the conclusions logically follows the given statements, even though they are at variance with commonly known facts. Statements: All leaders are good team workers. All good team workers are good orators. Conclusions: I. Some good team workers are leaders. II. All good orators are leaders.
Answers
Answered by
3
Answer:
Conclusion I is true.
Explanation:
Statements: All leaders are good team workers. All good team workers are good orators.
I. Some good team workers are leaders.
Not all leaders are good team workers and not all good team workers are leaders. Not all good team workers are good orators.
This is an example of deductive reasoning.
Deductive moves from generalized facts that are known to be true to a true and specific conclusion.
Similar questions