discuss the arguments advanced in favour of the regional continuity model of human Origins.Do you think it provides a convincing explanation of the archaeological evidence? Give reasons for your answer.
Answers
Answer:
1) The regional continuity model states that the hominid ancestors had migrated from continent and their any evolution passed in separate nations. 2) The remains of the mixed fashionable and archaic bone sorts found across the world counsel that evolution of humans passed at the same time in numerous elements of the world; in all probability by the method of ‘genes flowing between populations.
3) However, I don't believe that the proof of the regional continuity model justifies the origin of humans.
4) The replacement theory and its out there evidences would be the simplest to justify it. in step with this theory, man originated in continent.
5) Between 100,000–120,000 years past, they migrated to Europe, Asia and Australia. this era was marked by the extinction of the sooner hominid species and also the sustenance of man. step by step and eventually, the man had unfold across completely different elements of the globe.
6) this is often considered the explanation behind the degree of similarity among all fashionable humans by the replacement theorists.
7) the very fact that the oldest human fossil has conjointly been excavated from continent any reinforces my belief on the replacement theory
Answer:
The argument advanced in favour of the regional continuity model of human origins is that archaic Homo sapiens evolved at different rates in different regions into modern humans. That's why there was difference in the first appearance of modern humans in various parts of world.