Question

Distinguish between interpretation and construction discuss the golden rule of interpretation

Answer 1

The difference between interpretation and construction can be drawn clearly on the following grounds:

In law, interpretation refers to, understanding the words and true sense in the provisions of the statute. On the other hand, construction is described as drawing conclusions, in relation to the case, that lie beyond the outright expression of the legal text.
While interpretation is all about the linguistic meaning of the legal text, Construction determines the legal effect of the words and writings of the statute.
When the simple meaning of the legal text is to be drawn, then that will be called an interpretation. Conversely, when the literal meaning of the words used in the legal text results in ambiguity, then construction is opted, so as to decide whether the case is covered by it or not.

Answer 2



Explanation:

Interpretation basically refers to the act of attempting to investigate the real sense of an enactment achieved by giving words their natural meaning. Thus, interpretation occurs when we find the real and clear intent of the constitution. Since the golden rule of interpretation states that the words of a statute must prima facie be assigned their primary goal.

Construction, on the other hand, refers to an individual's capacity to conclude, based on the true spirit of enactment.  Therefore, construction occurs after contest of the constitution.