Social Sciences, asked by Rachit45511, 1 year ago

Do you think it was correct for India to give refuge to the Dalai Lama and his Tibetan followers?

Answers

Answered by GauravSaxena01
1
  • The invite appeared innocuous: A Chinese general asked if the ordinal Dalai Lama would really like to envision a performance by a Chinese dance company. however once he was told to return to the Chinese HQ while not troopers or armed bodyguards, per his official chronicle, the Tibetans detected a lure.

  • After years of guerrilla war between Tibetan rebels and also the Chinese troopers in an exceedingly land that China thought of to be its territory, the friendly overture appeared suspicious enough that, on the day of the performance, thousands of protesters encircled the Dalai Lama’s palace in Lhasa to stay him from being kidnapped, in remission or killed. Over the subsequent few days, the protests swollen into declarations of Tibetan independence and also the mobilizing of rebel troops to fight the Chinese forces. The State Oracle, the Dalai Lama’s consultant, urged him to escape.

  • On today, March 17, in 1959, Tibet’s non secular and pol, then 23, disguised himself as a soldier and slipped through the crowds outside the palace he’d ne'er see once more. He commenced a dangerous journey to asylum, crossing the chain on foot with a cortege of troopers and cupboard members. They traveled solely at the hours of darkness, to avoid detection by Chinese sentries. Rumors later circulated among Tibetans that the Dalai Lama “had been screened from Red planes by mist and low clouds conjured up by the prayers of Buddhist holy men,” per TIME’s 1959 cowl story concerning the escape. however till he appeared in Republic of India, period of time once withdrawing, individuals round the world feared that he had been killed, per the BBC.
Answered by gratefuljarette
3

Answer:

Yes, it was a correct decision made by India to give refuge to Tibet’s spiritual head Dalai Lama and his followers.

Explanation:

India’s decision to give refuge to Dalai Lama when Tibet was under attack from China was a big contrast to the foreign policy. But according to me, it was an apt decision taken by the country back then. India was not directly meddling with China’s affairs but the forceful annexation that they were doing on Tibet was highly immoral.

Foreign affairs and policies should all come second to humanitarian laws going by which giving refuge to Dalai Lama and his followers was a correct decision.

Similar questions