English, asked by subedidivya488, 3 months ago

Do you think the magnitude of loss caused the disaster could have been reduced? give reasons.
plz give short but effective answer
plz dont scam

Answers

Answered by shiva3121
5
Yeah , the loss caused by a disaster can be reduced by making the building according to the kind of disasters happening at a place . Like if a place is hit by a frequent cyclones then the buildings built shouldn’t be high rise as air speed closer to ground is low compared to a higher hights in the sky so damage will be more if a sky scrapers are built in those areas.
Whereas in other case where tsunamis hit frequently the buildings should be high rise so as to save people and other things from drowning in water . Water would not be able to reach higher hights and hence it won’t damage to people as all the people will be rescued to higher hight than the water .

And so just by constructing the buildings accordingly to the types of disasters , the loss caused by the disaster could be reduced or minimised .

Hope this helps.
Answered by acsahjosemon40
6

Answer:

Yeah , the loss caused by a disaster can be reduced by making the building according to the kind of disasters happening at a place . Like if a place is hit by a frequent cyclones then the buildings built shouldn’t be high rise as air speed closer to ground is low compared to a higher hights in the sky so damage will be more if a sky scrapers are built in those areas.

Whereas in other case where tsunamis hit frequently the buildings should be high rise so as to save people and other things from drowning in water . Water would not be able to reach higher hights and hence it won’t damage to people as all the people will be rescued to higher hight than the water .

And so just by constructing the buildings accordingly to the types of disasters , the loss caused by the disaster could be reduced or minimised .

Similar questions