eassy on examining exams 200 wards
Answers
Answer:
please search from Google
Answer:
Essay: Examining Exams
An examination can defined as a test or an assessment to measure the knowledge, life skill, aptitude, physical fitness, or ability in some other field. It is usually a set of questions used to find out a student's knowledge or lessons learned. In education an examination is a test to show the knowledge and ability of a student. A student who takes an examination is a candidate. The person who decides how well the student has performed is the examiner. An examination may be a written test, an on-screen test or a practical test.
An examination is meant to assess the knowledge gained by students in prescribed subjects. An examination creates a purpose in students to learn and prepare their studies sincerely. It imparts a sense of competitiveness, hard work and dedication in the life of students. Over the years the educational and examination systems keep changing. The syllabus and the methods of teaching are never constant.
This brings us to the question of how far are these systems and methods effective in ascertaining the proficiency of a student. Can an examination reveal the real qualities of students? Can it fathom the intelligence of students when in fact they are talented in different subjects, even those subjects not taught in schools and colleges?
The proverb "morning shows the day" is not applicable to most students in real life situations. A mediocre student may perform well in a competitive examination by preparing some selective topics, whereas a meritorious student may not be able to perform better comparatively. Human history has many great minds who did poorly in schools and colleges.
Examinations compel students to study and prepare for those topics in which they are not interested. Great minds cannot be tested by the prevailing examination system. The whole system is more or less defective. There is no scope in dealing differently with the fast learners and the slow learners. Fast and slow learners are not the same as those who are learning impaired. The syllabus must not be too vast because it puts unnecessary pressure not only on teachers and students but also on parents. Frequent change of syllabus with the change of government and ruling the political party must be avoided. Educational system must be free from bureaucratic and political interference.
To let examinations decide the success or failure of students in their career and life is not justifiable. The present system of examination encourages the habit of cramming and even memorising lessons without knowing what it is all about. Examinations create worry and mental stress. The desperation encourages copying. Examinations, however cannot be avoided altogether. But some educational reforms can help minimise the flaws and shortcomings. The final result should be on the basis of several examinations conducted by various examiners. The question papers should be designed so as to test the overall aspect of a student. By this the dread of examination can be brought down up to a certain extent. The system of examinations should be over-hauled by intellectuals and experienced educationists. Examinations should be a time to look forward to, not something that can turn out to be a traumatic experience.