Question

ee and the giraffe ate vegetables.
T
Summative Assessment
Answer the following questions.
1.
What did the giraffe want to prove?
2.
What did he ask to give up?
3. What happened when both the friends reached the garden enclosed by a low wall?
4. What happened outside the garden enclosed by a high wall?
5. Do you appreciate the talents of other people or do you consider yourself superior to
others?
6. What is the moral of this story?
7. What was the challenge between the goat and the giraffe?
8. What do you understand by humility?
9. What was an argument between the goat and the giraffe?​

Answer 1

The answers to the questions provided are:

1. The giraffe wanted to prove that just because he was taller than the goat he was better than the goat.
2. He asked to give up his tail if he could not prove that being bigger was better than being shorter.
3. When both friends reached the garden enclosed by a low wall the giraffe was able to reach the leaves of the trees to eat them but the goat had to stay hungry.
4. When they reached the garden enclosed by a high wall the goat was able to enter the place and eat fresh vegetables but the giraffe did not get anything to eat.
5. Yes, I appreciate the talents of other people and I feel that everyone is unique and has both their strengths and weaknesses that should be accepted.
6. The moral of this story is that Everyone is unique in his own way.
7. The challenge was that if the giraffe was not able to prove that being tall was better he would cut its tail and if the goat was able to prove that being shorter was better he would cut its snout.
8. Humility means to be free from pride and arrogance and has the quality of being modest.
9. The argument between the goat and the giraffe was to prove whether being taller was better or shorter was better.

#SPJ1

For similar questions view:

https://brainly.in/question/20580911

https://brainly.in/question/52938024

Answer 2

The following are the responses to the questions:

• The giraffe sought to establish his superiority over the goat just by his height.
• If he couldn't demonstrate that being bigger was preferable to being shorter, he asked to be allowed to lose his tail.
• The giraffe was able to reach the tree leaves to eat them when the two companions arrived at the garden, which was surrounded by a short wall, but the goat was forced to remain hungry.
• The goat was able to access the garden, which was surrounded by a high wall, and eat fresh veggies, but the giraffe was unable to find anything to eat.

• Yes, I recognize others' gifts and believe that everyone is special and has both strengths and shortcomings that should be accepted.
• The lesson in this tale is that each person is distinctive in their way.
• The challenge was that if the giraffe failed to demonstrate why being tall was preferable, its tail would be cut off, and if the goat succeeded in demonstrating why being shorter was preferable, its snout would be severed.
• Being humble and free from pride and conceit are characteristics of humility.
• The giraffe and goat engaged in a debate to determine if being taller or shorter was preferable.

#SPJ1

https://brainly.in/question/25252491

https://brainly.in/question/47335732