Chemistry, asked by Rinisha08, 1 year ago

Equatorial bonds must be longer as that would explain the maximum possible distance where there would be minimum repulsion. But it's said that it's shorter as compared to axial/apical. How?

Answers

Answered by nanudhull464
3
on the equatorial position the repulsion is less Between bonds so the bonds are small but the equatorial bonds repel axial bonds so axial bonds are long

nanudhull464: yes you are right
nanudhull464: do you like to friendship with me
Rinisha08: Wth
nanudhull464: tell
nanudhull464: yes or no
Rinisha08: Sorry , have to go.
nanudhull464: where
Rinisha08: Thanks for helping tho
nanudhull464: are you using social media
nanudhull464: hlo please
Answered by Anonymous286
3
First of all there are many explainations to this
However I would explain the one which personally understood and is simple to understand
1)We know that there are 3 equatorial bonds
2)2 axial bonds
3)There exist bond pair-bond pair type of repulsion between axial and equatorial bonds
Now the the amount of repulsion that the axial bonds get is from 3 equatorial bonds
However the 3 equatorial bonds get repulsion only from 2 axial bonds
As you know more the repulsion the further they go away(i.e becomes long)
So since axial bonds get repulsion from 3 bonds it's longer than the equatorial bonds
Hope it helps
:)

Rinisha08: Thank you☺
Anonymous286: np :)
Similar questions