ESSAY ON ABOUT 250 WORDS--
"Industrialization has destroyed traditional occupations" State your views either for or against this statement.
*I need this on 2january
please help
Answers
Answer:
The process of industrialization has transformed the entire old socio-economic structure which was founded on traditional feudal and pre-feudal principles of birth and status. It has brought about changes in property system and in division of labour, and has given rise to new social strata and classes which stand above the traditional division of region and religion.
Industrialization has brought about many changes non-existent in pre-industrial societies. It has introduced new social relation, urbanisation, geographical concentration of people and changes in occupational structure. It has resulted in certain common features which are different from the features of pre-industrial or traditional agricultural societies. Various changes that have taken place in political, educational, religious, familial and stratification spheres due to impact of industrialization are discussed below.
Political:
Capitalism was already well set by the time industrial revolution commenced. It stimulated the growth of industry as large machines were costly and individual worker could not purchase for use. The weaving industry was the first to come fully under the grip of capitalists. Role of weaver got confined to labour selling and wage earning.
These in fact came to be established, owned and controlled by capitalists. Under the new system the workers were rendered completely dependent on their employers. They lived together, in large agglomerating, in absolute misery and total poverty.
Their misery and poor working conditions forced them to think about their well being. The liberal and revolutionary ideas as propounded by the thinkers from time to time, stimulated their thinking. The Chartist movement in Britain was the first manifestation of worker’s collective action against the capitalist regime.
The Revolution in Europe in 1830, 1848 and 1870 on the whole provided the inspiration to the working class. The rulers did not fail to take note of it. The liberal leadership took up the cause of working men. Men like Charles Early Grey, Robert Peel, Grladstone educated the ‘master’s, the working class of their real strength. They invested the people with a political consciousness and made them earnest, about their rights. They were desirous to change their condition, generated keenness for it, and set the change in motion.
Constitutionalism in England for centuries was the intellectual exercise of the Constitutional lawyers and of elected parliamentarians. For the generality democracy was name not a fact. But the process that came to be set a foot soon galvanised the working class to unity and action.
The Parliamentary Reform Act 1832, did not bring democracy to the British, but effected a breach in the strong hold of autocracy and aristocracy. After the representation was conceded to the new industrial towns and to the industrial classes, the composition of the House of Commons underwent a distinct change. With it began the liberal legislations.
Explanation:
PLZZ MARK AS THE BRAINLIEST
HIT THAT HEART LIKE ME