essay on capability of a person
Answers
Answered by
11
Hey!!
Here is your answer:-
✴️ The Capability Approach is defined by its choice of focus upon the moral significance of individuals’ capability of achieving the kind of lives they have reason to value. This distinguishes it from more established approaches to ethical evaluation, such as utilitarianism or resourcism, which focus exclusively on subjective well-being or the availability of means to the good life, respectively.
✴️ A person’s capability to live a good life is defined in terms of the set of valuable ‘beings and doings’ like being in good health or having loving relationships with others to which they have real access.
✴️ The Capability Approach was first articulated by the Indian economist and philosopher Amartya Sen in the 1980s, and remains most closely associated with him. It has been employed extensively in the context of human development, for example, by the United Nations Development Programme, as a broader, deeper alternative to narrowly economic metrics such as growth in GDP per capita.
✴️ Here ‘poverty’ is understood as deprivation in the capability to live a good life, and ‘development’ is understood as capability expansion.
Hope... It... Helps... You...❤️❤️
Here is your answer:-
✴️ The Capability Approach is defined by its choice of focus upon the moral significance of individuals’ capability of achieving the kind of lives they have reason to value. This distinguishes it from more established approaches to ethical evaluation, such as utilitarianism or resourcism, which focus exclusively on subjective well-being or the availability of means to the good life, respectively.
✴️ A person’s capability to live a good life is defined in terms of the set of valuable ‘beings and doings’ like being in good health or having loving relationships with others to which they have real access.
✴️ The Capability Approach was first articulated by the Indian economist and philosopher Amartya Sen in the 1980s, and remains most closely associated with him. It has been employed extensively in the context of human development, for example, by the United Nations Development Programme, as a broader, deeper alternative to narrowly economic metrics such as growth in GDP per capita.
✴️ Here ‘poverty’ is understood as deprivation in the capability to live a good life, and ‘development’ is understood as capability expansion.
Hope... It... Helps... You...❤️❤️
Answered by
3
Hey mate , here is your answer........
"""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
✌✌✌✌✌✌✌✌
There is no definitive list of capabilities. Thus Robeyns (2005, p 96) comments, "the capability approach thus covers all dimensions of human well-being". Due to this extensive coverage of the capability approach it will therefore be very difficult to make a definitive list and Sen have explicitly refused from being forced into making a list. He has always argued that capabilities will depend on the context of its usage, though this has made other scholars see this as a limitation of the capability. Nussbaum has criticised Sen for his inability to give a list of relevant capabilities, and she goes further to address the issue by developing ten 'central human capabilities' which are (1) life, (2)bodily health,(3)bodily integrity,(4)senses, imagination and thought,(5) emotions,(6) practical reasoning,(7) affiliation,(8) other species (9) play, and (10) control over one's environment, but quick to add that her list is not exhaustive, and open to revision. She also argued that a set of list will avoid the situation where any capability can be seen as valuable even if it is used to cause harm to others. In response to these criticisms Sen said that it was not an issue of listing important capabilities that is relevant but endorsing a predetermined list of capabilities.
HOPE it helps to you!!!!!!!!!
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
plzz mark as brainliest answer
"""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
✌✌✌✌✌✌✌✌
There is no definitive list of capabilities. Thus Robeyns (2005, p 96) comments, "the capability approach thus covers all dimensions of human well-being". Due to this extensive coverage of the capability approach it will therefore be very difficult to make a definitive list and Sen have explicitly refused from being forced into making a list. He has always argued that capabilities will depend on the context of its usage, though this has made other scholars see this as a limitation of the capability. Nussbaum has criticised Sen for his inability to give a list of relevant capabilities, and she goes further to address the issue by developing ten 'central human capabilities' which are (1) life, (2)bodily health,(3)bodily integrity,(4)senses, imagination and thought,(5) emotions,(6) practical reasoning,(7) affiliation,(8) other species (9) play, and (10) control over one's environment, but quick to add that her list is not exhaustive, and open to revision. She also argued that a set of list will avoid the situation where any capability can be seen as valuable even if it is used to cause harm to others. In response to these criticisms Sen said that it was not an issue of listing important capabilities that is relevant but endorsing a predetermined list of capabilities.
HOPE it helps to you!!!!!!!!!
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
plzz mark as brainliest answer
MadhavSharmaKaushik:
don't comments i can't talk to u
Similar questions