Political Science, asked by yuvrajghai, 10 months ago

evaluate the relevance of the non-aligned movement after the end of the cold war.​

Answers

Answered by mmuruganmail
3

Answer:

Explanation:The Non-alignment movement was started by the Third world nations or the newly independent nations who don't want to join any of the existing power blocs. Non-alignment movement in this context emerged as the most desirable platform which provided this nation independence to follow its own foreign policy. It was adopted by Asian, African, and Latin American countries. The emergence of NAM in the cold war situation provided the world politics a new twist. For the newly independent countries, NAM became a protector to escape from race of militarization promoted by two world powers at that time i.e. USSR and USA. Non-alignment countries were in favor of disarmament and were against social discrimination. It emerged as a great moral force and initiated the co-operation for world peace in the cold war era. The policy of Non-alignment that is staying away from alliance should not be considered as neutrality or isolation. There is a vast difference between the concept of NAM, neutrality, and isolation.

Non-alignment movement is one of the major foreign policy developed and adopted during the cold war era. In this article, attention is paid on the relevance of Non-alignment movement even after the end of the cold war

Answered by vaishnavikalbhor3636
1

Now make me brain least plzz

Attachments:
Similar questions