examine the argument against the concept of desert. by 100 words.
Answers
examine the argument against the concept of desert. by 100 words.
Answer:
While it may have some intuitive appeal, it can also obscure the structural injustices and subjective biases that shape people's lives.
Explanation:
The concept of desert is often used in discussions of justice and fairness, particularly in relation to the distribution of resources and opportunities. According to this concept, individuals deserve certain outcomes or rewards based on their actions, choices, or inherent characteristics. However, there are several arguments against the concept of desert that challenge its validity and applicability.
One argument against desert is that it assumes a level playing field and ignores the structural inequalities that shape people's lives. For example, individuals born into poverty or with certain disabilities may face systemic barriers that limit their opportunities and outcomes, regardless of their actions or choices. Thus, the concept of desert may lead to blaming individuals for circumstances that are beyond their control.
Another argument against desert is that it is often based on subjective and arbitrary criteria. For instance, what constitutes hard work, merit, or talent may vary depending on cultural, social, and historical factors. Moreover, the idea that some individuals deserve more than others can lead to social divisions, resentment, and unequal treatment.
In conclusion, the concept of desert is a complex and contested idea that requires careful consideration of its assumptions, implications, and limitations. While it may have some intuitive appeal, it can also obscure the structural injustices and subjective biases that shape people's lives.
To learn more about similar question visit:
https://brainly.in/question/1092548?referrer=searchResults
https://brainly.in/question/12498275?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ6