Explain how Levitt and Dubner’s argument effectively uses logical, concrete evidence to arrive at conclusions about morality. Address how well reasoning and evidence are used.
Answers
Levitt and Dubner’s argument effectively uses logical, concrete evidence to arrive at conclusions about morality and cheating practices. Morality and cheating practices are more common in high incentive situations where the stakes of telling a lie or fooling a person brings enormous rewards. They use statistical evidence and different examples support the fact that Levitt and Dubner have arrived at a generalisation on moral grounds.
Their claim about swindling existing in high-motivator situations the realities they present about sumo and the bagel business their utilization of factual evidence their utilization of various illustrations (sumo and bagels) in their evidence their by and large utilization of inductive thinking to land at a speculation about ethical quality.