Explain how Levitt and Dubner’s argument effectively uses logical, concrete evidence to arrive at conclusions about morality. Address how well reasoning and evidence are used.
Answers
The claim was that cheating exists in the high-incentive situations.
They presented the fact about the sumo and bagel business that are used as the statistical evidence.
Another example used by them in an argument was the evidence of their overall usage of inductive reasoning to arrive at a generalization about morality.
Answer:
Levitt and Dubner’s argument effectively uses logical, concrete evidence to arrive at conclusions about morality and cheating practices. Morality and cheating practices are more common in high incentive situations where the stakes of telling a lie or fooling a person brings enormous rewards. They use statistical evidence and different examples support the fact that Levitt and Dubner have arrived at a generalisation on moral grounds.
Explanation: