Explain the role of thinkers and middle class during the french revolution
Answers
Answered by
3
I think you can split the French Revolution into three parts, if you want to think about how the different social classes played their roles.
Upper Classes - The Complacent. They had benefited from a system where many had bought their way into the nobility, and where they had not needed to pay taxes (they voluntarily paid some money every so often, but nothing as regular as taxation). I think there were many who wanted systematic changes for the good of France (which lagged behind the rest of Europe politically, socially and economically), but many were happy in the system which had been good to them and their ancestors, and probably underestimated desires for reform (very easy to do as many of them were outside of Paris which was really the powerhouse of the revolution throughout).Middle Classes - The Thinkers. They wanted change in France, and they were the people with ideas for what France should look like. More separation between Church and State, fairer taxation, a constitutional monarchy. Some were more radical than others, but this group was generally composed of people who had plans for a revolutionary and post-revolutionary France.Working Classes - The Angry. They were the force behind the radical revolution that executed suspected counter-revolutionaries mercilessly and often with little evidence of wrongdoing. More often radicals, often with republican tendencies following the bungled Flight to Varennes. They were used by powerful educated speakers like Marat, Danton and Robespierre to force their agenda through often more violent actions on the streets of Paris while proudly singing Ça Ira. They struggled under the Ancien Régime’s taxes and things like the Corvée, and the Ferme Générale (seriously France, privatised tax collection!).
But throughout much of the revolution it was in Paris that the Middle Classes and Working Classes were relevant. The rest of the country was generally more moderate and even more pro-monarchy compared to Paris.
I hope it may help u
Upper Classes - The Complacent. They had benefited from a system where many had bought their way into the nobility, and where they had not needed to pay taxes (they voluntarily paid some money every so often, but nothing as regular as taxation). I think there were many who wanted systematic changes for the good of France (which lagged behind the rest of Europe politically, socially and economically), but many were happy in the system which had been good to them and their ancestors, and probably underestimated desires for reform (very easy to do as many of them were outside of Paris which was really the powerhouse of the revolution throughout).Middle Classes - The Thinkers. They wanted change in France, and they were the people with ideas for what France should look like. More separation between Church and State, fairer taxation, a constitutional monarchy. Some were more radical than others, but this group was generally composed of people who had plans for a revolutionary and post-revolutionary France.Working Classes - The Angry. They were the force behind the radical revolution that executed suspected counter-revolutionaries mercilessly and often with little evidence of wrongdoing. More often radicals, often with republican tendencies following the bungled Flight to Varennes. They were used by powerful educated speakers like Marat, Danton and Robespierre to force their agenda through often more violent actions on the streets of Paris while proudly singing Ça Ira. They struggled under the Ancien Régime’s taxes and things like the Corvée, and the Ferme Générale (seriously France, privatised tax collection!).
But throughout much of the revolution it was in Paris that the Middle Classes and Working Classes were relevant. The rest of the country was generally more moderate and even more pro-monarchy compared to Paris.
I hope it may help u
Answered by
0
Answer:
idk
Explanation:
Similar questions