Question

"federalism have negative accept too" Justify this statement ​

Answer 1

Answer:

(2) federalism does not bring people closer to the government. (3) citizens suffer because of inequalities across states. (4) policies in one state may undermine policies in another state. (5) overlap of responsibilities among .

please mark me as brainliest

Answer 2

• Federalism doesn't bring people closer to government.
• Citizens suffer because of inequality between countries.
• The policy of one country can harm the policy of another country.
• Federalism is a mixed or composite mode of government that combines a general government( the central or" civil" government) with indigenous governments( parochial, state, cantonal, territorial, or othersub-unit governments), dividing the powers between the two.
• Federalism in the ultramodern period was first espoused in the unions of countries during the Old Swiss Confederacy.

• Federalism differs from confederalism, in which the general position of government is inferior to the indigenous position, and from degeneration within a unitary state, in which the indigenous position of government is inferior to the general position.
• .( 2) It represents the central form in the pathway of indigenous integration or separation, bounded on the lower intertwined side by confederalism and on the further intertwined side by degeneration within a unitary state.( 3)( 4)
• Exemplifications of a confederation or civil fiefdom or state include Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Brazil, Iraq, Canada, Germany, UAE, Mexico, India, Malaysia, Nepal, Nigeria, Pakistan, Russia, Switzerland, and United States.
• Some characterize the European Union as the pioneering illustration of federalism in amulti-state setting, in a conception nominated the" civil union of countries".

#SPJ3