Film review of robot 2.0 .
I want it because it is the topic of my ASL.Please help me.
Answers
Answered by
4
Director
shankar's films follow a certain template. We are introduced to a normal guy who takes on a larger-than-life villain in a mission to end some form of negativity. Basically, the usual good vs evil template is set against different backgrounds and they are given an out-and-out commercial-film treatment.
His latest outing 2.0 is no exception. It follows a similar path. Dr Vaseegaran (Rajinikanth) is a scientist who encounters the fifth force with his inventions Chitti, Nila (Amy Jackson) and 2.0 (Chitti reloaded robots).
All of Chennai is in grave danger as a mysterious looking crow is destroying the city. As expected, Chitti is brought back to take on the giant bird made out of mobile phones. However, Chitti alone is unable to save the people. In come 2.0 robots, with their quick wit and destruction power to take on Pakshi Raja alias Crow Man (Akshay Kumar).
Shankar's films are always grand in nature and they are laden with social messages for the society. In 2.0, it is about how humans misuse technology and make the world unfit for other living beings.
2.0 is a film that should be watched for its sheer scale and grandeur. It has a predictable storyline that might come across as a disappointment for many.
Even though the visual effects are on par with international standards, the story takes a beating towards the climax.
The sci-fi film is interesting in parts and does stay relevant despite the gap in between the beginning of its filming and its release date (2.0 began in 2015). Be it Nithyananda's dialogues or the use of several punch lines, 2.0 entertains the audience. And most of these are mouthed by robot Nila, which gives it a nice twist.
2.0 does not have anything new to offer given that the entire plot was given away in the trailer itself. There were no real surprises in the film and it comes as a huge letdown. The surprises that were kept under wraps found their way to the internet a few days before the film could hit the theatres. Again,blame it on technology, much like the film.
To see Rajinikanth in multiple avatars is in itself a treat for his fans. He has delivered a neat performance as Dr Vaseegaran, Chitti and 2.0. One has to admit that he looks plastic as 2.0 in a few places. Rajinikanth is convincing as the scientist Vaseegaran and Chitti, but it is in his 2.0 robot roles that he goes over the top with his expressions at times.
Akshay Kumar as an ornithologist is a little slow with actions, but he aptly conveys what he needs to with his expressions. Amy Jackson slips into her role as Nila, especially since the character does not require much emoting.
2.0 moves in its own pace and the makers' decision to actually stay away from the songs is a welcome change. While Rajinikanth doesn't get any heroic incoming sequence, Akshay Kumar's character does and the buildup to it looks interesting.
There is a flashback portion to ornithologist professor Pakshi Raja on why he became what he became. The entire portion was well shot, and is ably backed by Akshay Kumar's performance.
The climax, that runs for over 20 minutes, is the talking point of the film. With incredible CGI effects and brilliantly choreographed stunt sequences, it is just a visual spectacle unfolding on screen.
Shankar's little touches here and there in the film address much-needed topics such as politics, corruption and ecological imbalance. 2.0 goes overboard in a few places and becomes more of a science and history session than a commercial film so to say.
For example, in a scene, Pakshi Raja explains how humans, birds and animals have to coexist to live a peaceful life. Though it is a much-need message, it could have been explained in an intriguing manner rather than the pedantic treatment it gets.
Another disappointing aspect is that the film does not really offer any deep solution to the problem that it is hinged on.
In a nutshell, 2.0 is an enjoyable outing with several mass moments. However, it falls short of being a sci-fi film that has a strong story.
Shankar-directed 2.0 starring Rajinikanth and Akshay Kumar is a fun entertainer with brilliant visual effects. But the story turns predictable post intermission, says our review.
shankar's films follow a certain template. We are introduced to a normal guy who takes on a larger-than-life villain in a mission to end some form of negativity. Basically, the usual good vs evil template is set against different backgrounds and they are given an out-and-out commercial-film treatment.
His latest outing 2.0 is no exception. It follows a similar path. Dr Vaseegaran (Rajinikanth) is a scientist who encounters the fifth force with his inventions Chitti, Nila (Amy Jackson) and 2.0 (Chitti reloaded robots).
All of Chennai is in grave danger as a mysterious looking crow is destroying the city. As expected, Chitti is brought back to take on the giant bird made out of mobile phones. However, Chitti alone is unable to save the people. In come 2.0 robots, with their quick wit and destruction power to take on Pakshi Raja alias Crow Man (Akshay Kumar).
Shankar's films are always grand in nature and they are laden with social messages for the society. In 2.0, it is about how humans misuse technology and make the world unfit for other living beings.
2.0 is a film that should be watched for its sheer scale and grandeur. It has a predictable storyline that might come across as a disappointment for many.
Even though the visual effects are on par with international standards, the story takes a beating towards the climax.
The sci-fi film is interesting in parts and does stay relevant despite the gap in between the beginning of its filming and its release date (2.0 began in 2015). Be it Nithyananda's dialogues or the use of several punch lines, 2.0 entertains the audience. And most of these are mouthed by robot Nila, which gives it a nice twist.
2.0 does not have anything new to offer given that the entire plot was given away in the trailer itself. There were no real surprises in the film and it comes as a huge letdown. The surprises that were kept under wraps found their way to the internet a few days before the film could hit the theatres. Again,blame it on technology, much like the film.
To see Rajinikanth in multiple avatars is in itself a treat for his fans. He has delivered a neat performance as Dr Vaseegaran, Chitti and 2.0. One has to admit that he looks plastic as 2.0 in a few places. Rajinikanth is convincing as the scientist Vaseegaran and Chitti, but it is in his 2.0 robot roles that he goes over the top with his expressions at times.
Akshay Kumar as an ornithologist is a little slow with actions, but he aptly conveys what he needs to with his expressions. Amy Jackson slips into her role as Nila, especially since the character does not require much emoting.
2.0 moves in its own pace and the makers' decision to actually stay away from the songs is a welcome change. While Rajinikanth doesn't get any heroic incoming sequence, Akshay Kumar's character does and the buildup to it looks interesting.
There is a flashback portion to ornithologist professor Pakshi Raja on why he became what he became. The entire portion was well shot, and is ably backed by Akshay Kumar's performance.
The climax, that runs for over 20 minutes, is the talking point of the film. With incredible CGI effects and brilliantly choreographed stunt sequences, it is just a visual spectacle unfolding on screen.
Shankar's little touches here and there in the film address much-needed topics such as politics, corruption and ecological imbalance. 2.0 goes overboard in a few places and becomes more of a science and history session than a commercial film so to say.
For example, in a scene, Pakshi Raja explains how humans, birds and animals have to coexist to live a peaceful life. Though it is a much-need message, it could have been explained in an intriguing manner rather than the pedantic treatment it gets.
Another disappointing aspect is that the film does not really offer any deep solution to the problem that it is hinged on.
In a nutshell, 2.0 is an enjoyable outing with several mass moments. However, it falls short of being a sci-fi film that has a strong story.
Shankar-directed 2.0 starring Rajinikanth and Akshay Kumar is a fun entertainer with brilliant visual effects. But the story turns predictable post intermission, says our review.
srishtimalik46:
nyc review
thanks
wlcm
: )
^_^
thanks for marking me brainliest
wlcm
Similar questions