Fire and Ice
But if it had to perish twice, I think I Know toughly hate
TO Say that for destruction ice Is also great And would Suffice.
a) What does Ice stand for?
b) What could be the cause for destruction?
c) Which word in the stanza stands for destruction?
d) What, according to the poet, would bring an end to the world?
pls answert fast
i will mark u brainliest only if u follow me
Answers
Answered by
0
Answer:
There is no need for 'fire' to destroy the world. Even 'ice' is sufficient and 'strong' enough to cause the destruction of this world. If this world has to 'perish twice', then there is no need for fire to destroy it twice. 'Ice' is as 'strong' and 'great' a cause that can cause the end of this world.
Similar questions