Fossil of an organism is formed in deeper layers of earth then we can predict that
Answers
The formation of fossils demands that the organisms be buried quickly in an environment free of oxygen where nothing will disturb them. We find few places like this on earth today. Flood conditions are ideal for forming fossils, and the global Flood described in Genesis provides a starting point to examine the fossil record. Far from showing gradual changes of one organism transforming into another, the fossil record shows fully-formed organisms appearing suddenly and disappearing—just what we would expect if life were created and then later judged by the Flood. The Bible offers a framework to understand the fossil record.
What Your Textbook Says about the Fossil Record
Evolutionary ConceptPrentice HallGlencoeHoltArticlesLiving fossils are nearly identical to those found in the fossil record.—585, 610, 615T209C7:1Plant evolution is preserved in the fossil record.—566, 610—7:2, 7:3The oldest fossils are 3.5 billion years old.368585, 591—4:1, 4:3, 7:4Fossils provide information about past environments.—566, 568–569, 6091977:5, 7:11Fossil fuels formed gradually as organisms were buried in swamps millions of years ago.85, 95–97, T366, 375, 377, 410131, 231, 446, T533, 555, T600D, 612–613, 616, T682C, 686, T687, 687–690, 707, 74138, 159, 2767:6, 7:7, 7:8, 7:11Intact mammoth fossils have been found in arctic ice.—566, 572—7:9Fossils provide information about how life on earth has evolved.343, 383566, 5691997:10, 7:11Organisms must be buried quickly to be fossilized.345—1987:5, 7:9, 7:11Note: Page numbers preceded by “T” indicate items from the teacher notes found in the margins of the Teacher’s Edition.
What We Really Know about the Fossil Record
We should start the discussion about fossils by recognizing that the fossil evidence is shared by everyone. There are not creationist fossils and evolutionist fossils, but there are creationist and evolutionist interpretations of the fossils. When we observe fossils in the present, we can take measurements and determine composition, but the real interest in fossils is interpreting where they came from. Once we start attempting to explain how the organisms came to be fossilized or how and where they lived before they died, we must remember that we are using presuppositions in that explanation—we have gone from operational to historical science.
As mentioned in an earlier chapter, the fossil record does show a general order as we move from the lowermost geologic layers to the uppermost. Evolutionary geologists would interpret this order as the progression of life from simple chemicals to single cells to zebras and eventually to humans. The assumed progression in the fossil record is used to prove that biological evolution through natural selection changed one kind of organism into another over millions of years. There are many fossils that occur out of sequence that are explained away to confirm the presupposition of an old earth and biological evolution.
FossilPreserved remains of once-living organisms.
When creation scientists look at the fossil evidence they interpret it in light of the Flood described in Genesis. So how can the Flood model be used to explain the general order seen in the fossil record? The answer is that in general, the lower layers record the organisms that were buried first in the Flood, and the upper layers record the later stages of the Flood. The model that seems to best fit the evidence involves different ecological zones being buried at different times. Using the description of the Flood in Genesis and the fossil evidence, the stages of the Flood are recreated to explain the fossil record.
The presence of sea-dwelling creatures...
please mark as brainliest...
Answer:
Just like any other piece of historical evidence, fossils don’t speak for themselves. Evolutionists believe that the fossil record supports their theory of the slow and gradual evolution of life from amoebas to astronauts. Creation scientists reject this view and choose to accept the biblical version of the origin of life on earth. The fossil record is instead primarily a record of the destruction and death caused by the Genesis Flood. Extensive fossil graveyards and coal deposits are more consistent with a global catastrophe than with slow and steady processes over millions of years.
The formation of fossils demands that the organisms be buried quickly in an environment free of oxygen where nothing will disturb them. We find few places like this on earth today. Flood conditions are ideal for forming fossils, and the global Flood described in Genesis provides a starting point to examine the fossil record. Far from showing gradual changes of one organism transforming into another, the fossil record shows fully-formed organisms appearing suddenly and disappearing—just what we would expect if life were created and then later judged by the Flood. The Bible offers a framework to understand the fossil record.
What Your Textbook Says about the Fossil Record
Evolutionary ConceptPrentice HallGlencoeHoltArticlesLiving fossils are nearly identical to those found in the fossil record.—585, 610, 615T209C7:1Plant evolution is preserved in the fossil record.—566, 610—7:2, 7:3The oldest fossils are 3.5 billion years old.368585, 591—4:1, 4:3, 7:4Fossils provide information about past environments.—566, 568–569, 6091977:5, 7:11Fossil fuels formed gradually as organisms were buried in swamps millions of years ago.85, 95–97, T366, 375, 377, 410131, 231, 446, T533, 555, T600D, 612–613, 616, T682C, 686, T687, 687–690, 707, 74138, 159, 2767:6, 7:7, 7:8, 7:11Intact mammoth fossils have been found in arctic ice.—566, 572—7:9Fossils provide information about how life on earth has evolved.343, 383566, 5691997:10, 7:11Organisms must be buried quickly to be fossilized.345—1987:5, 7:9, 7:11Note: Page numbers preceded by “T” indicate items from the teacher notes found in the margins of the Teacher’s Edition.
What We Really Know about the Fossil Record
We should start the discussion about fossils by recognizing that the fossil evidence is shared by everyone. There are not creationist fossils and evolutionist fossils, but there are creationist and evolutionist interpretations of the fossils. When we observe fossils in the present, we can take measurements and determine composition, but the real interest in fossils is interpreting where they came from. Once we start attempting to explain how the organisms came to be fossilized or how and where they lived before they died, we must remember that we are using presuppositions in that explanation—we have gone from operational to historical science.
As mentioned in an earlier chapter, the fossil record does show a general order as we move from the lowermost geologic layers to the uppermost. Evolutionary geologists would interpret this order as the progression of life from simple chemicals to single cells to zebras and eventually to humans. The assumed progression in the fossil record is used to prove that biological evolution through natural selection changed one kind of organism into another over millions of years. There are many fossils that occur out of sequence that are explained away to confirm the presupposition of an old earth and biological evolution.
FossilPreserved remains of once-living organisms.
When creation scientists look at the fossil evidence they interpret it in light of the Flood described in Genesis. So how can the Flood model be used to explain the general order seen in the fossil record? The answer is that in general, the lower layers record the organisms that were buried first in the Flood, and the upper layers record the later stages of the Flood. The model that seems to best fit the evidence involves different ecological zones being buried at different times. Using the description of the Flood in Genesis and the fossil evidence, the stages of the Flood are recreated to explain the fossil record.
The presence of sea-dwelling creatures...
please mark as brainliest...