Good deeds happy thought mining explain
Answers
Answer:
Good in itself has a, what I calls, a meaningless meaning if not properly understood, probably good this or good that, is the greatest cliche in linguistic history, bad is not in the same category, bad is blotted out just as dark is seen as having little meaning because of what it hides, bad implies shame to be hidden away.
Adverse to dark light might be, and very similar too is the way that good is always seen as being always open for discussion while bad is a closed subject.
Thoughts and words should also be segregated from deeds, which are always bearing the consequences of interrelated activities which thoughts do not, words are a little bit more distant from Inner Self but more defined and connected to Personal Feelings.
Timely thoughts tie up with logical deductions derived from past experience and mental abstruse calculations, a procedure signed off by infinity setting thoughts in a realm of metaphysical conception that words and deeds can never enter.
Good words also have a profound relevance that extrapolates etymological meaning associated with biological accomplishment and mental genius and also defines any non organic relevance that can be ascribed to success as a phenomena entering into an accumulative stage of development, rather than, a state of being marginalised, constrained, subsumed, or isolated.
The meaning of good in these literal intrinsic terms excluding superstitious analogy is consistent with growth and accumulation, which must come at the expense of something going into decline or being modified into a lesser state of active capacity, within the function that it once participated in, and lost the consequence of goodness.
Good words in our context of common usage is focused on deeds and derived from thoughts causing feelings, although thought multiplied as ideas operating to support or stifle metabolic feelings can also be effective as causing deeds.
Things thought through produce good ideas usually and go on to be good deeds.
Thoughts can be their own master but it's better if ideas are the dictator of thoughts, particularly where vested interests are concerned.
Utilitarian thinkers consider good thoughts to be those that relate to human happiness shared by the greatest number, as a process of methodology to preserve and expand happiness causing capability by social mechanisms put in place by political activism.
So common agreements causing happiness are the purpose of good thoughts, words and deeds which are determined and expanded by good social rituals and procedures, making old rituals and procedures a paramount focus causing questionable functionality and attracting the astute attention of Utilitarian thinkers advising on the best Social practices.
In absolute terms this process of creating Social Culture is tied in with Pantheism which presents the conclusion of all aspirations and physical procedures to be the fulfillment of symbiotic development between good and bad opposing each other, both claiming to be good.
It seems ironic that bad must be the dominant premise in this syllogistic philosophical analysis, and I'm not the first to present a diatribe against the idea of good leading to perfection, the Bogomill beat me to it by about seven hundred years when they concluded that Satan Created our Planet Earth.
However putting that aside, the consequence to be reckoned with as the eventual outcome of everything in terms of procedural social drivers does prescribe good thoughts and words to be the result of a stable consistent cognitive process, where bad is the opposition to good and always superior to good thereby prohibiting bad motivation as being socially acceptable, as good is always asserting itself to challenge bad.
This normal situation could be due to the commitment of established social rituals and procedures opposing changes of any kind.
Alas, !! good thoughts, good words and good deeds always lead to the functioning of a stable Civil Society turning bad, because, as noted by Confucius good is broken by corruption by bribery and sedition with unstoppable expectations making demands on unjustified privlige consequently causing conflict.
I think that fundamental good thoughts words and deeds must be considered relevant with our epistemology comprising a movement away from Utopia which was the absolute bliss of nothing at all.
I'm not sure what Jeremy Bentham had to say about totality as the movement away from absolute blissful happiness, and blissful happiness fighting to get back everything in residual form, but I personally don't believe it's possible to disintegrate individual thought once it has reached this level of relevance to all existential phenomenon.
So to my way of thinking, the meaning of good thoughts, good words and good deeds is finding the best form of cognitive condition that is consistent with past relevance and leads to a formality that is more consistent with equal opportunity.
Explanation:
Hope it helps..
Follow me..
Thank my answers..