Question

Hey guys. Last point giveaway for tonight.

A deeply philosophical question.

Should funding be alloted more for expanding to further planets and colonising them, or should it be allocated to improving Earth and reducing population by any means necessary. ANY MEANS.

What if the Earth got overpopulated in 10 years and you had this choice. What would you do?

Remember, you can choose only one.

Or you could let both options go and let humanity die out. Your choice.

Explain your opinion thoroughly.

Answer 1

I guess I would rather make places like Antarctica and other "inhabitable places" on earth habitable. Ofcourse if u can think of settling on Mars, why can't you make the North and South Pole more habitable? I believe there is enough space on Earth to settle the population that wud explode in 10 years time.
To stop further population growth, well, that isn't the part of your question! So, thats what I would do to accommodate population after 10 years.
Thanks for taking the time to read!!

Answer 2

Ahoy UD!


So, I just found this question more interesting than memes so here I am answering it :-P

According to my mind ,
If choices would be given to me to choose from I would choose the option of funding to technology to make other planets suitable for living.


➡Why I chose that option?

Well, actually I thought of that because If funds would be allotted to the technology and science we would be able to make other planets suitable for habitation . A simple solution comes put if habitation is possible on other planets and that solution is that even if the earth got overpopulated (which is gonna happen soon) we can send people to other planets where habitation has become possible because of science.

If this happens then we don't need to think further about the disintegration of life of earth because we will make space on other planets. That would be a pretty logical solution of all the problems with just one measure.


And yes, The other option of depleting population by any meams.? well that's not possible . Depleting population simple means mass killing which isn't possible as who wants to be another Adolf Hitler? Any means . No means.




hope this helps!
Cheers B-)