Question

Historians now have come to increasingly recognise that the typical worker in the mid-nineteenth century was not a machine operator but the traditional craftsperson and labourer. Why? Support with arguments

Answer 1

Heyya!


Yes, this statement is true for more reasons than one. Although in the 19th century, many innovations and inventions had revolutionized the way in which industries functioned, especially the textile industry, the traditional workers and craftsmen still dominated the production. The many new machines and innovations were not wholly accepted by the industrialists due to various reasons. Some of the reasons are:

1. The installation, commissioning and maintenance of these machines was expensive.

2. Most industrialists or capitalists were not convinced about the workings of these new machines and so did not encourage new machinery.

3. The new machines required frequent repair and this cost the industrialists a heavy amount.

4. Although there was an influx of workers to cities, a large number of them still lived in rural communities and continued to contribute to the gross production.

Due to all the reasons mentioned above, traditional craftsmen and workers still occupied an important place in the British economy.

Hope it helps! : )

Answer 2

Explanation:

yes

Historians now have come to increasingly recognise that the typical worker in the mid-nineteenth century was not a machine operator but the traditional crafts person and labourer'. Analyse the statement.