Question

Hola ❕
Plz Answer the Question..
Right answer will mark as brainliest
:- Write the names of the scientists, authors, people, and their works regards wildlife conservation:-)

Answer 1

Helen Macdonald, Robert Macfarlane, Mark Cocker, Stephen Moss, Tim Dee, Kathleen Jamie, Sean Borodale, Melissa Harrison, Dave Goulson are some scientists, authors, people, and their works regards wildlife conservation.



pls mark my answer as brainliest

Answer 2

In recent years, wildlife conservation has attracted great public attention. However, substantial distinctions can be found in the prevailing concepts of wildlife conservation, particularly with the recent notion that emphasizes animal rights. Wildlife welfare and wildlife rights are not synonymous, with welfare more compatible with the reasonable and legal utilization of wildlife. The key to scientific wildlife conservation is the appropriate awareness and appreciation of the relationship between wildlife conservation and utilization and the theoretical basis of holism. Nevertheless, rational biases regarding the public’s understanding of wildlife conservation and the spread of information via social media still exist. As such, expansion of the concept of scientific wildlife conservation requires the application of several measures.

INTRODUCTION

Wildlife conservation has two meanings. One is the preservation of both species and species diversity, the other is based on animal welfare, which is primarily aimed at wildlife in captivity (Lu, 2009). Conservation education is an important component of environmental education, and is aimed at expanding human awareness of conservation biodiversity and at changing environmental attitudes and behaviors to promote conservation through education and practical activities.

Wildlife conservation education forms part of conservation education. Since environmental concerns have increased across all society, wildlife conservation has become a significant social issue. However, there are considerable differences in the concepts of wildlife conservation, with several plausible protection ideas currently debated. Some people believe that wildlife conservation should incorporate the protection of all animals, and follow the principles of animal. In addition, such protection includes resistance to live bear bile used in traditional Chinese medicine and prohibition of hunting and related activities. Furthermore, absolute conservation has strong public sensibilities, which can result in extreme wildlife conservation activities, thus welfare and animal rights. In contrast, others believe that wildlife conservation should be based upon scientific attitudes and strategies. Unfortunately, absolute protection currently dominates public opinion and sympathy (Zhang et al, 2015), with scientific discussion and rational thinking often discounted.1

Absolute protection includes the random release of animals, which has led to the invasion of alien species weakening and hindering the process of wildlife conservation itself (Karanth et al., 2008).

Since public attitude plays a very important role in the formulation and implementation of wildlife conservation management policies, some of the main problems that need to be solved in the construction of an ecologically-based civilization are defining wildlife conservation, promoting scientific wildlife protection, and encouraging an objective view of wildlife conservation by the public.

CONCEPT OF SCIENTIFIC WILDLIFE CONSERVATION

To understand the public’s attitude to wildlife conservation, we must first understand the relationship between humans and wildlife.


Wildlife as an important resource in human evolution

Research has shown that Homo habilisand Homo sapiens (archaic) increased the proportion of meat protein in their diets by hunting, resulting in the rapid development and increased volume of the brain (Wang, 2004). In addition, meat was crucial to the reproduction and evolution of prehistoric humans (Niche, 1995). Compared with Homo habilis, Homo sapiens (archaic) used fire to cook and soften food, resulting in large changes in human morphology (Qiao, 2011). The shortening of food chewing and digestion time resulted in significant changes in mandible and dental morphology, such as jaw retraction, smaller teeth, rostrum retraction, and smaller crinium viscerale (Yu & Zhai, 2004). In addition, human learned to use fire and the consumption of meat protein, which is more easily absorbed than raw meat, following the introduction of fire and cooking promoted the development of the human brain and body. Furthermore, hunting activities improved human cognition and problem solving abilities, and promoted the evolution of physical fitness (Qiao, 2011). In short, the consumption of meat promoted human body health by reducing disease and strengthening the functions of the brain and other organs (Qiao, 2011).