Question

HOTS : “Kannauj was a symbol of sovereignty.” How can you support the statement?

Answer 1

Answer:yes I support that statement because

Explanation:Wars with the Palas & the Rashtrakutas

Much of it had to do with the control over Kanyakubja as "since the days of Harsha, Kanauj was considered the symbol of sovereignty of north India… control of Kanauj also implied control of the upper Gangetic valley and its rich resources in trade and agriculture"

Please mark me as brainlist

Answer 2

Answer:

Much of it had to do with the control over Kanyakubja as "since the days of Harsha, Kanauj was considered the symbol of sovereignty of north India. Control of Kanauj also implied control of the upper Gangetic valley and its rich resources in trade and agriculture.