History, asked by rssssss, 1 year ago

How did civil disobedience movement differ from non cooperation movement


rssssss: Plz let me know bcoz tomorrow is my exam

Answers

Answered by rahul746
3
Though the two terms Non-cooperation and civil obedience appear to be similar in their meanings, there is a number of difference between these two terms. Non-cooperation and Civil disobedience operated as movements in the history, in a number of countries. When examining the history of India, both movements can be identified. However, the implementation of these two criterion bear evidence that there exists observable difference. First it is necessary to define the two terms. Noncooperation is the refusal to cooperate with the government of a country whereas Civil disobedience refers to the refusal to obey certain laws of a country. Despite the fact that the definitions sound similar, the difference lies in noncooperation being rather passive in comparison to civil disobedience that plays an active role. This article attempts to highlight the difference between the two while examining the two terms.
Answered by ishantik
2
civil disobedience movement differ from non cooperation movmt because at time of NVM people not train not undertood the acctual meaning of the movement but many people supporter of Gandhi ji and many follower but in civil disobedience movement peoples are support in few times and this is violence type movement of Gandhi ji reason for civil disobedience movement simon commission of 1927 and great economic depression of 1929
Similar questions