History, asked by karunasingla82pdczzr, 11 months ago

How did the British solve the problem of building ships for the Royal Navy?

Answers

Answered by muskaan1411
0

The Royal Navy is building up a fleet of two, 70,000-ton-displacement carriers. HMS Queen Elizabeth commissioned in December 2017. Sister ship Prince of Wales is fitting out for commissioning as early as 2019.

by David Axe Follow @daxe on TwitterL

The United Kingdom’s new defense secretary has signalled that the Royal Navy at all times will operate at least one fully combat-capable aircraft carrier.

Penny Mordaunt took over after Prime Minister Theresa May in early May 2019 fired former defense secretary Gavin Williamson for allegedly leaking sensitive information to the press. Mordaunt on May 15, 2019 announced the Ministry of Defense would develop a new “National Carrier Policy.”

“We will have one carrier available at very high readiness at all times,” Mordaunt said.

The Royal Navy is building up a fleet of two, 70,000-ton-displacement carriers. HMS Queen Elizabeth commissioned in December 2017. Sister ship Prince of Wales is fitting out for commissioning as early as 2019. Queen Elizabeth could deploy with Royal Air Force F-35B stealth fighters starting in 2020.

Together, the flattops cost around $10 billion to develop and build.

OCT

8

2001

U.S. President George W. Bush announces the establishment of the Office of Homeland Security.

1956

New York Yankees's Don Larsen pitched the only perfect game in a World Series.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Sponsored

Add This To Your Site

“Nothing symbolises our intent and ambition for global Britain and has captured the hearts of our citizens more than our new carriers,” Mordaunt said. “Nine acres of sovereign territory that will give us the ability to project power from anywhere in the world.”

“And when Prince of Wales joins [Queen Elizabeth] in the fleet in the near future … we will have one carrier available at very high readiness at all times,” the defense secretary added. “And this will match our strategic nuclear deterrent with a conventional one. I want to make sure that we make the most of this incredible sovereign capability.”

Money as always is a problem. The U.K. armed forces have struggled in recent years to maintain the pool of forces from which the task force and at-sea deterrence would draw. Periodic cuts since the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991 have shrunk the British military roughly by half.

The most recent rounds of cuts starting in 2010 eliminated two aircraft carriers, two amphibious ships, four frigates, an army brigade, more than a third of the army's tanks and artillery and all of the air force's Harrier jump jets and maritime patrol planes. Uniformed manpower dropped by 30,000.

As recently as late 2017, there were rumors that the United Kingdom might try to offset the cost of the country's exit from the European Union by further cutting the military. Army brigades and amphibious ships appeared to be particularly vulnerable.

The army recently announced it would upgrade only 148 of its 227 Challenger 2 tanks.

British military spending has stabilized at around $55 billion annually, thanks in part to a transfer of funds from the $13-billion reserve account for the navy’s four new Dreadnought-class ballistic-missile submarines.

But even $55 billion a year might not be enough to maintain both carriers and their aircraft plus a robust fleet of naval surface combatants that, among other missions, escort the carriers during wartime.

After deep cuts in 2010 the Royal Navy is down to just 19 surface combatants including 13 frigates and six destroyers. Not all of the vessels are operational at the same time. Mechanical problems and difficulty recruiting sailors in the recent past has compelled the navy temporarily to lay up several warships.

Buying new aircraft carriers instead of frigates and destroyers was a “bad idea,” the Lord Houghton of Richmond, former chief of the defense staff, in May 2019 told a House of Commons committee.

The carriers were “affordable only to the detriment of the surface fleet,” Lord Houghton said, according to The Telegraph.

Giving evidence to the National Security Strategy committee, Lord Houghton said that as vice chief of the defense staff in 2010 he was not in favor of buying two aircraft carriers and new F-35 stealth jets for the air force whilst also expecting the defense budget to include the nuclear deterrent submarines.

Spending on such expensive equipment “massively unbalances the amount of money to spend on capabilities in more active need of use,” he said.

Mordaunt for her part said she was “not going to be shy about asking for more money” to keep the carriers afloat while also buying at least 13 new frigates to replace older ships.

David Axe serves as Defense Editor of the National Interest. He is the author of the graphic novels War Fix, War Is Boring and Machete Squad.

Answered by lenin100
0

Answer:

mark as brainlist plz.

Attachments:
Similar questions