Question

how do indian theatre differ from greek and roman theatre in past?

Answer 1

Explanation:

But there some very distinct differences. Greek Theaters were carved out of a hillside while Roman theaters were built up from solid ground using either cement or stone. Also the orchestra is larger because the structures were used for other events which required more space.

mark me as a brainlist bro plzz

Answer 2

Explanation:

Indian theatre is one of the most ancient forms of theatre and it features a detailed textual, sculptural, and dramatic effects which emerged in mid first millennium BC.[1][2] Like in the areas of music and dance, the Indian theatre is also defined by the dramatic performance defined by the concept of Natya, which is a Sanskrit word for drama but encompasses dramatic narrative, virtuostic dance, and music.[3][2] Indian theatre exerted influence beyond its borders, reaching ancient China and other countries in the Far East.

But there some very distinct differences. Greek Theaters were carved out of a hillside and Roman theaters were built up from solid ground using either cement or stone. Also the orchestra is larger because the structures were used for other events which required more space.