Social Sciences, asked by shreyaa006, 10 months ago

how is history divided today? does this periodisation make any difference?​

Answers

Answered by raja8556
22

Answer:

History is divided into:

1) Pre-historical time

2) Medieval time

3) modern time

ya it make more different because people divided history in types to learn it's complexity easily that like periodic table in science which maked for learning easy.


shreyaa006: can u also give the answer of the second question?
raja8556: ok
Answered by Yashraj2022sl
0

Answer:

First we will discuss how is history divided today:

The past is divided by historians into extensive time periods with reoccurring traits. British historians classified India's history into three periods at the middle of the nineteenth century: "Hindu," "Muslim," and "British." This distinction was founded on the notion that the only substantial historical change—in the economy, society, or culture—had been the shift in the rulers' religion. Today, few historians use this periodization. Most people look to economic and social issues to identify the key components of various historical moments. When splitting the past into periods, historians encounter various difficulties. The explanation for this is that there was a significant degree of technological advancement throughout the mediaeval era that would qualify as modern in the context of today.

Despite this, the era is referred to as mediaeval rather than modern. The mediaeval era, on the other hand, comes after the modern era.

Now, we will discuss how periodization make any difference:

It's a system that has some real potential. It can be effective, especially if you're the type of person who likes to compartmentalize. It makes sense for us as a society to group things together. Periodization is practical and simple to comprehend. Its primary flaw is that it presents history as a static period of time. You move from one era to the next and so on, giving the impression that history is extremely linear. History is far more nuanced than that; it cannot always be reduced to a simple cause-and-effect relationship. In general, it's helpful. It makes history more approachable and simple to comprehend, and as a method it works. However, it's crucial to carefully consider the consequences of utilizing any system of organizing history.

#SPJ2

Similar questions