How is the Constitutional
Monarchy of U.K. different from
the Constitutional Federation of
the U.A.E.? pls help
Answers
While the Monarchy of the UK might seem very similar to the shiekdoms of the UAE, there is one key difference.
In the United Kingdom, the monarchy is more of a ceremonial role and the Queen does not hold any real power. Key laws are made in the parliament and many national decisions are made by the Prime Minister. There is complete and functional democracy.
In the UAE, there is no democracy and key rules, laws and legislation is passed by the rulers of the emirates, without any parliamentary representation of the local population.
Hence, the UAE is a proper monarchy, while the UK is actually a democracy in principle.
Constitutional Monarchy of U.K.
1. The British monarch is a ceremonial head.
2. The Prime Minister, the British Parliament and the Government exercise
their powers on behalf of the monarch. Formally the monarch possesses the
powers.
3. Before accepting a significant public office a person has to swear an
oath of allegiance to the monarch.
4. The monarch has to act on the advice of the Government.
Constitutional Federation of the U.A.E.
1. It has a framework of federal, presidential and absolute monarchy.
2. The United Arab Emirates is a federation of seven constituent
monarchies. They are the Emirates of Abu Dhabi, Ajman, Dubai, Fujairah, Ras
al-Khaimah, Sharjah and Umm al-Quwain.
3. The ruler of Abu Dhabi is the President of the U.A.E. and the head of
the state.
4. The ruler of Dubai is the Prime Minister of the U.A.E. and the head of
the government.
5. The Federal Supreme Council comprises of the individual rulers of the seven emirates.
Read more on Brainly.in - https://brainly.in/question/2209019#readmore