Question

how was the civil disobedience movement different from the non cooperation movement support the statement with example? (please answer in 5 - 5 points of two of all in simple language)

Answer 1

Hlo .....

@@ Civil disobedience movement...

* It was the movement not to follow any rule of Britishers....

* In this all the restrictions were removed by Indians....

* It was the movement which lead to salt act by Gandhi ji....

* It was a non violence movement...

* It got success in terms of abolish many hard rules...

@@ Non cooperation movement....

* In this movement all the British products were destroyed by Indians...

* All the posts of Indians given by Britishers were returned back...

* Sometimes it goes at a violence manner...

* In this Britishers had to face many opposition's by Indians...

* But at a moment Gandhi ji withdrawal out of it at it was violent...

## Good luck !!!

Answer 2

$\bf \: How \: was \: CDM \: different \: from \\ \bf \: NCM$

So,
1. In NCM (Non-cooperation movement, people were asked to Non-cooperate with British government. But in CDM (Civil Disobedience Movement) , people were not only asked to Non-cooperate as they hain 1921 - 22, but also break the colonial rules.

2. And during CDM, thousands of people supported Mahatma Gandhi by manufacturing salt and breaking the law. They protested in front of government salt factories.

3. Foreign clothes were boycotted and liquor shops were picketed.

4. Peasants refused to pay the revenue and chaukidari taxes, village official.

5. NCM was non-violated movement while CDM led to violation. Forest people violated forest laws by going into reserved forests and collect wood, graze cattle.

Hope this helps ;)