History, asked by rajeshktelang, 9 months ago

how was the politics of the radicals with the congress different from that of the moderates

Answers

Answered by princy5867
2

Answer:

Some of the reasons for dissatisfaction with British rule in the 1870s and 1880s are as follows:

The Arms Act was passed in 1878. This Act disallowed Indians from possessing arms.

The Vernacular Press Act was passed in 1878. This Act empowered the government to confiscate the assets of newspapers including their printing presses, if the newspaper published anything “objectionable”.

The government tried to introduce the Ilbert Bill in 1883. The bill made provisions for trial of British or European persons by Indians. Thus, the Ilbert Bill sought equality between British and Indian judges in the country. But the whites opposed the Bill and forced the government to withdraw it.

Explanation:

.

Answered by mayajakhar79
2

\huge{\underline{\underline{\bf{\pink{Answer}}}}}

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

\impliesThe difference between the moderates and Radicals were:

1. Moderates had full faith in good intentions of the british government while Radicals had no faith in them.

2. The aims of the Moderates were more reforms and that too within the British empire but the radicals wanted nothing less than swaraj or self government.

3. The Moderates wanted to achieve their aims through constitutional means but the radicals wanted to achieve their aims by force of their own strength.

4. The moderates were seldom sent to jail but the radical leaders were beaten, handcuffed and sent to jail several times.

5. Moderate leaders were Dadabhai Naoroji, Surendra Nath Banerjee, Gopal Krishna Gokhale etc while Radical leaders were Bipin Chandra pal, Tilak and Lala Lajpat Rai.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Similar questions