Geography, asked by bhavyachoudhary, 1 year ago

Human beings have destroyed much of the natural vegetationjustify your statement

Answers

Answered by ITZAARAV
2

\huge\mathbb\blue{BONJOUR,}

\huge\mathfrak{Answer:}

Yes, this is true as researchers recently found that humans have destroyed tenth of Earth's wilderness in the last 25 years and there may be none left within a century if trends continue.

Researchers found a vast area the size of two Alaskas – 3.3m square kilometres – had been tarnished by human activities between 1993 and today, which experts said was a “shockingly bad” and “profoundly large number”.

Researchers found a vast area the size of two Alaskas – 3.3m square kilometres – had been tarnished by human activities between 1993 and today, which experts said was a “shockingly bad” and “profoundly large number”.The Amazon accounted for nearly a third of the “catastrophic” loss, showing huge tracts of pristine rainforest are still being disrupted despite the Brazilian government slowing deforestation rates in recent years. A further 14% disappeared in central Africa, home to thousands of species including forest elephants and chimpanzees.

The loss of the world’s last untouched refuges would not just be disastrous for endangered species but for climate change efforts, the authors said, because some of the forests store enormous amounts of carbon.

The loss of the world’s last untouched refuges would not just be disastrous for endangered species but for climate change efforts, the authors said, because some of the forests store enormous amounts of carbon.“Without any policies to protect these areas, they are falling victim to widespread development. We probably have one to two decades to turn this around,” said lead author Dr James Watson, of the University of Queensland and Wildlife Conservation Society.

The loss of the world’s last untouched refuges would not just be disastrous for endangered species but for climate change efforts, the authors said, because some of the forests store enormous amounts of carbon.“Without any policies to protect these areas, they are falling victim to widespread development. We probably have one to two decades to turn this around,” said lead author Dr James Watson, of the University of Queensland and Wildlife Conservation Society.The analysis defined wilderness as places that are “ecologically largely intact” and “mostly free of human disturbance”, though some have indigenous people living within them. The team counted areas as no longer wilderness if they scored on eight measures of humanity’s footprint, including roads, lights at night and agriculture.

<font color ="purple"><marquee behavior ="alternate"> ~♥~~♥~Hope It Helps~♥~~♥~</font color ="purple "></marquee behavior="alternate">

\huge\mathfrak{Regards}

\huge\mathbb\red{ITZAARAV}


bhavyachoudhary: I is awosome dude thanks
bhavyachoudhary: it
ITZAARAV: My pleasure
ITZAARAV: if u like my answer then follow me on my another id
bhavyachoudhary: Tell it
Similar questions