Question

Identify the determinants of the outcomes of the politics of social division and explain them

Answer 1

anwer:

The outcome depends on how people perceive their identities.

The outcome depends on how political leaders raise the demands of any community.

It depends on how the government reacts to the demands of different groups.

Thus, the assertion of social diversities in a country need not be seen as a source of danger. In a democracy, political expression of social divisions is very normal and can be healthy.

Answer 2

$\boxed{HERE \: IS \: YOUR \: ANSWER}$

Three factors are crucial in deciding the outcome of $\color{red}{politics\: of \:social\: division:}$

$\boxed{How \:people\: perceive \:their\: indentities}$
If people see their identities in singular and exclusive term,it becomes very difficult to accommodate. It is much easier $<b>if the people see that their identities are multiple and are complementary with the national identity.$ This help them to stay together.

$\boxed{How \:political\: leaders\: raise\: the \:demands \:of \:any \:community }$
It is easier to accept the demands that are within the constitutional framework and are not at the cost of another community. $<b>The leaders of different communities presented their demands in a such a way that these could not be accommodated within a single community$ .

$\boxed{How\: the\: government\: reacts \:to\: the\: demand\: of \:different\: groups}$
$<b>If the rulers are willing to share power and accommodate the reasonable demand of minority community, social division become less threatening for the country$ .But if they try to suppress such a demand in the name of national unity, the end result is often quite opposite.

❤HOPE IT HELPS YOU❤
ッ