Question

if A*B and B/C, then ___

​

Answer 1

Answer:

it is a formula and therefore does not have a answer.

Step-by-step explanation:

u just have to learn the formula to write the answer

Answer 2

Transitive law, in math and rationale, any assertion of the structure "If aRb and bRc, aRc," where "R" is a specific connection (e.g., "… is equivalent to… "), a, b, c are factors (terms that might be supplanted with objects), and the consequence of supplanting a, b, and c with objects is consistently a genuine sentence.

• An illustration of a transitive law is "On the off chance that an is equivalent to b and b is equivalent to c, an is equivalent to c." There are transitive laws for certain relations however for nobody else.
• A transitive connection holds among an and c assuming it likewise holds among an and b and b and c for any replacement of articles for a, b, and c. In this way, "… is equivalent to… " is such a connection, with no guarantees "… is more noteworthy than… " and "… is not exactly… "  
• There are two sorts of connections for which there are no transitive laws: intransitive relations and nontransitive relations.
• An intransitive connection does not hold among an and c assuming it additionally holds among an and b and b and c for any replacement of items for a, b, and c.
• Consequently, "… is the (natural) girl of… " is intransitive, since, supposing that Mary is the little girl of Jane and Jane is the girl of Alice, Mary can't be the little girl of Alice. In like manner "… is the square of… "A nontransitive connection could hold among an and c assuming it likewise holds among an and b and b and c, contingent upon the items fill in for a, b, and c.
• All in all, there is something like one replacement on which the connection among an and c does hold and somewhere around one replacement on which it doesn't. The relations "… loves… " and "… isn't equivalent to … " are models.