Question

If she was marrying Mr. Gupta (1)/ she would have been (2)/ recognized as Mrs. Gupta. (3)/ No Error (4) what is wrong explain it

Answer 1

"If she had married Mr. Gupta she would recognized as Mrs. Gupta.

Answer 2

Answer:

In the sentence, "if she was marrying Mr. Gupta she would have been recognized as Mrs. Gupta", the first part of it wrong. Adding ‘she was married to’ before the sentence will form the correct answer – If she was married to Mr. Gupta…Mrs. Gupta. Was marrying is the error in the line and moreover, it is in the past continuous tense which doesn’t go with the proper meaning of the remaining sentence.