If someone were to describe "The Rosetta Stone” to a friend, he or she would most likely compare it to
Answers
The Rosetta stone can effectively be compared to the various pillars erected by King Ashoka. Here are a few reasons why the comparison is appropriate:
1. Royal Origin- The Rosetta stone and the Ashoka pillars were both erected by kings. One was created during the reign of King Ptolemy the fifth while the other was established during the time of King Ashoka.
2. Material – The Rosetta stone, as the name suggests is made up of rock. Similarly, the Ashokan pillars are made of stone.
3. Inscriptions- The Rosetta stone has inscriptions on it as do the Ashoka pillars. The Rosetta stone contains texts in two different languages while the Ashoka pillars use only one language.
4. Significance- Both of them are historically very significant as they shed light on the life of people as it used to be during the olden days.
5. Placement- Both the Rosetta stone and the Ashokan pillars were originally placed in public places. Later, conquerors moved them to other places. In fact while the entire Rosetta stone is placed in the British Museum, the same place also houses fragments of the Ashokan pillar.
The Rosetta Stone is written in three contents since when it was composed, there were three contents being utilized in Egypt.
The first was hieroglyphic which was the content utilized for imperative or religious reports.
The third was Greek which the dialect of the leaders of Egypt was around then.
Finishing an individual dimension of Language Training should take most students about 40-50 hours.