Question

If you had been alive during the ratification debates, which side would you have been on, the Federalists or the Anti-Federalists? Why?

Answer 1

Answer:

federalist because there are many points to speak about it.

Answer 2

If I had been alive during the ratification debates, I would have been on the side of Federalists

EXPLANATION:

• Not as organized as federalists were the anti-federalists, and they did not have a united position on the right governmental form. The Anti-Federalists argued against the national power expansion. They preferred small provincial governments, as practiced in Confederation Articles, with a limited national authority. People generally thought that a Republican administration could only operate at state level and would not work at national level.
• Therefore, the freedom of the nation could only be protect by a confederacy of individual countries. The absence of a bill of rights was another, and maybe their most famous, concern. Most Anti-Federalists feared that the Constitution could not protect the rights of individuals and states sufficiently without a bill of rights.
• George Mason's strongest voice for this was that he believed that the new constitution would trump State bills of law and would not be adequately protected in relation to the rights of citizens. This concern ultimately led to the passment in New York, Virginia, Rhode Island, Massachusetts and North Carolina of the Bill of Rights as a condition for ratification.
• Alternately, the Federalists, primarily led by James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton thought that it not only would be possible, but also necessary, to set up a larger national government "to establish more perfect union" by improving relations between the States. Until then, the common belief was that a republic is small and localised and can only operate efficiently. The federalists opposed the assumption that a strong national republic better protects the people's freedoms.
• The extension of the domain of the republic would better protect individual and minority rights from abuse by a majority. The federalists also required the autonomy and structure of countries to be maintained. In order to achieve this, they advocated a federal government with special delegated powers.
• Anything not assigned to the federal government would be reserved to individuals and states. In the end, their objective was to maintain the government principle by consent. The legitimacy of the new government could be guaranteed by building a government on the basis of popular sovereignty, without sacrificing the sovereignty of the States .

To know more

What strategy did the federalists use to win ratification?

https://brainly.in/question/6844540

Which was the main reason that Federalists supported ratification of the Constitution?

https://brainly.in/question/9812893