imagine that a meeting has been called in your area to discuss the socialist idea of doing away with private property and introducing collective ownership . write the speech you would make at the meeting if you are a
⇒a poor farm laborer working in the fields
⇒a medium-level landowner
⇒a house owner
Answers
Speech:
(a) A Poor Laborer Working in the Fields: Dear friends, nature has not done any partiality in offering advantages for everyone subsequently a couple of individuals having more land than others is misguided. All the advantages from our yields are the outcome of troublesome work done by people like me in planting seeds, watering the yields, keeping them freed from weeds and assembling them.
Thusly, I figure we labourers ought to participate in the advantages created utilizing the proposal of harvests, instead of getting an asset wage. To enable this, private obligation ought to be annulled and total duty regarding fields by all the labourers who are going after it introduced. Thank you.
(b) A Medium-Level Landowner: Respected friends, I don't agree that private obligation regarding should be cleared. It isn't normal and will diminish crop creation. You won't endeavour to fabricate crop creation if the whole advantage won't you.
In all honesty, what should be done is the unprejudiced dissemination of land to all, so only a couple of individuals don't have colossal packages of land, while others have to manage with little districts of land, or are precluded absolutely from claiming any land ownership. Thusly, all should be landowners so everybody benefits. Thank you.
(c) A House Owner: Friends, I figure everybody should have the basic necessities of life like food, a sheltered house and clothing, yet not to the impairment of others' property. The people who don't have land should be given the best approach to win their employments in the manner is useful. Ability to guarantee the individual property is an incredible thing for a free people.
I like having my own property that no one has the alternative to just force away from me. My neighbours may guarantee more than me, yet what is mine can't avoid being mine. We have earned our property through the real undertakings of our antecedents along these lines we should not be prevented from securing the work and knowledge of our forebears in picking up land. I think this is altogether reasonable. Thank you.
Learn more about speech:
https://brainly.in/question/13512962
https://brainly.in/question/17716402
Answer:
A poor labourer working in the fields Dear friends, nature has not done any partiality in providing resources to everyone and so, some people owning more land than others is incorrect. All the profits from our crops are the results of hard work done by people like me in planting seeds, watering the crops, keeping them free from weeds and harvesting them. So, I think we labourers should share in the profits made from sale of crops, instead of getting a subsistence wage. To enable this, private ownership of property needs to be abolished and collective ownership of the fields by all the one you labourers who are working on it introduced.
Thank you.
(b) A medium-level landowner Respected friends, I do not agree that private ownership of property should be removed. It is not rational and will reduce the crop production. You will not try to increase crop production if the whole profit is not going to you. In fact, what should be done is the equitable distribution of land to all, so that only some people do not own large tracts of land, while others have to manage with small areas of land, or are deprived completely of any land ownership. So, all should be landowners so that everybody benefits.
Thank you.
(c) A house owner Friends, I think everybody should have the basic necessities of life like food, shelter and clothing, but not at the expense of other people's property. Those who do not have land should be given the means to earn their livelihood in whatever manner is convenient. We have earned our property through the sincere efforts of our ancestors and so, we should not be deprived of the labour and wisdom of our forefathers in acquiring land. I think this is very reasonable.
Thank you.
Explanation:
please like