In a hypothetical ecosystem that consists of only plants, deer and tigers , if all the deers are removed what will happen?
Answers
=> If deer is missing from the given food chain, it becomes imbalance and the food chain will break up. In absence of deer tiger fails to catch pay and satisfy its hunger. As a result either it will die without food or will try to enter inside any other food chain by eating other herbivores
=>If all deer are removed from forest , than it will effect the food chain , and hence lead to the imbalance in ecosystem . If all the deer removed from the forest , other host unable to get food . Such as, lion unable to get sufficient food for being alive and hence lead to death
=>If deer is missing in the food chain then there will be no herbivore to consume grass, so population of grass will increase. Tiger will start to die of hunger, so the population of tiger will decrease.
=> When conditions are bad enough for a population to become extinct, usually the ecosystem is in bad shape already, and many other species are going extinct at the same time. If you mean a population of deer, then it may upset the local ecosystem for a time, until another organism evolves into that niche.
Thanks
Mark branliest
@join the army of the shadows
In the hypothetical ecosystem that consists of only plants, deer and tigers, if all the deers are removed then the population of plants will tremendously increase and that of tigers will dwindle.
1. The situation above can be described by understanding an ecosystem.
2. An ecosystems consists primarily of producers, herbivores and carnivores in that order
3. If any family is removed the ones above will gradually die and the ones below will flourish, disturbing the consistency.
4. This if all herbivores, that is, deer are removed the carnivores, that is, tigers will die of starvation and the producers or plants will show an increase in population as no creature will consume it.