History, asked by gad0417, 7 months ago

In Gibbons v. Ogden, the Supreme Court ruled that
Gibbons’s federal license allowed him to operate in multiple states.
Ogden’s license could not operate an interstate business.
Ogden could not compete with Gibbons in interstate commerce.
Gibbons and Ogden had to work together to operate in two states.

Answers

Answered by Anonymous
3

Answer:

Citation: Supreme Court Decree in Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824; Records of the Supreme Court of the United States; Record Group 267; National Archives. This Supreme Court decision forbade states from enacting any legislation that would interfere with Congress's right to regulate commerce among the separate states.

.

.

Answered by Anonymous
4

Answer:

In Gibbons v. Ogden, the Supreme Court ruled that

Gibbons’s federal license allowed him to operate in multiple states.

Ogden’s license could not operate an interstate business.

Ogden could not compete with Gibbons in interstate commerce.

Gibbons and Ogden had to work together to operate in two states.

Similar questions