In what ways was the administration of the Company different from that of lndian rulers
Answers
Answer:
The main administrative differences between the East India Company and Indian rulers are-
Unlike Indian rulers the company laid down sound administrative system in India. Three cities of Bomaby, Madras and Calcutta were the main administrative centers of the Company. Each presidency was under the charge of the governors. The governor General was the head of the administration. A new judicial system was established in 1772. The British laid down a sound system of administration in India. The Indian rulers had however, a centralised system of administration where the kings had all the powers of their respective kingdom. The armies of the rulers largely consisted of cavalry and were trained in conventional outdated warfare.
Indian ruler normally inherit the power on the basis of the monarchy dynasty or birth. The British administrator was appointed by the democratically elected government of Great Britain.
While both the Indian ruler and British administrator used to exploit their subject. But with the British administration the exploited wealth will go to Great Britain. The wealth accumulated by Indian ruler used to remain in India under the control of the rulers.
Answer:
Unlike Indian rulers the company laid down sound administrative system in India. Three cities of Bomaby, Madras and Calcutta were the main administrative centers of the Company. Each presidency was under the charge of the governors. The governor General was the head of the administration. A new judicial system was established in 1772. The British laid down a sound system of administration in India. The Indian rulers had however, a centralised system of administration where the kings had all the powers of their respective kingdom. The armies of the rulers largely consisted of cavalry and were trained in conventional outdated warfare.
Indian ruler normally inherit the power on the basis of the monarchy dynasty or birth. The British administrator was appointed by the democratically elected government of Great Britain.
While both the Indian ruler and British administrator used to exploit their subject. But with the British administration the exploited wealth will go to Great Britain. The wealth accumulated by Indian ruler used to remain in India under the control of the rulers.
Explanation: