Question

In which three ways were liberals in 19th century is different from radicals of that period?

Answer 1

Hey friend,
Here is the answer you were looking for:
Liberals:
I) They wanted a nation which tolerated all religions.
II) They oppose religious discrimination and uncontrollable power of dinestic rulers.
III) They wanted a representative elected parliamentary government but did not believe in Universal Adult Franchise. They also didn't want the right to vote for women.

Now,
Radicals:
I) They wanted a government based on the majority of a country's population. They supported Universal Adult Franchise, including the right to vote for women
II) Unlike Liberals, they opposed the privileges of the landlords and the industrialist.
III) They were not against the existence of private property but oppose concentration of property in a few hands.
HOPE MY ANSWER WOULD BE HELPFUL TO YOU!!!!!☺☺
AND IF YOU LIKED MY ANSWER, THEN PLEASE MARK AS BRAINLIEST.

Answer 2

1] Liberals wanted end of autocracy . They hoped for an independent nation consent of people , government and parliament . whereas radicals wanted social hierarchies , monarchy church and social privileges

2) Liberals wanted equality before law and freedom for individuals

3) Liberals wanted freedom of market and no tariff duty was to be implemented

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Or

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Liberals:-

1) Liberals wanted a nation which tolerated all region.

2) Liberals opposed the uncontrolled power of dynastic rulers.

3) They wanted to safeguard the right to individual against government.

4) They argued for a representative, elected parliamentry government. Subject to laws interrupted by a well trained judiciary that was independent of rulers and officials.

Radicals:-

1) Radicals wanted a nation in which government was based on the majority of a country's population.

2) Mainly supported women's sufferagate movements.

3) Unlike liberals, they opposed the privilages of great landowners and wealthy factory owners, they were not against the existence of private property but disliked concentration of property in the hands of a few.